Urban designer, researcher, and educator
Research Scientist & Global Labs Lead
MIT Senseable City Lab
I explore how AI and urban design can expand who can reason about, imagine, and shape urban transformation.

I work at the intersection of research, AI, design, and international program building.
Over seven years at MIT Senseable City Lab, my role has evolved from researcher to Research Scientist and Global Labs Lead, building research programs, teams, partnerships, and international initiatives across multiple cities.
I especially enjoy the phase when research is still taking shape: working alongside municipalities, local associations, and citizens, and creating the conditions for all of them to talk to one another. A city official, a community organizer, and a data scientist rarely describe the same street in the same way, and I like building the space where those perspectives meet and become a shared question.
I am most interested in what happens when research leaves the paper: when a new way of seeing the city becomes a tool, a collaboration, an experiment, or a decision.
A trajectory from studying cities to building the systems through which they can be studied.
I joined MIT Senseable City Lab in 2019 as a Visiting PhD Researcher. Since then, the scale of my work has progressively expanded, from individual research questions, to interdisciplinary projects, to building and leading international research programs.
Joined MIT through the Roberto Rocca Fellowship, developing research at the intersection of spatial design, urban data, and human behavior.
Developed a research agenda connecting spatial design with computational methods to understand how people experience and use cities.
Expanded this research across scales and urban systems, combining computational methods with questions of mobility, environmental exposure, public space, and human behavior.
From conducting research to building research programs.
Led the development of the Dubai research program from its inception, bringing together research questions, interdisciplinary teams, city and academic partners, data, experimentation, and pathways toward implementation.
From one research program to an international research network.
Expanded this model across MIT Senseable City Lab's global programs, connecting research agendas with distinct urban contexts, institutional partnerships, interdisciplinary teams, resources, and long-term research strategies.
Research prioritization, cross-lab scientific direction, and development of new research opportunities.
Leadership and coordination of 40+ researchers and students across an international network, including hiring, mentorship, resources, and team development.
Coordination of multi-year, multi-million-dollar research programs, provisional budgets, and resource allocation.
Development of collaborations with governments, universities, industry, and local institutions.
Operating models connecting scientific ambition with partner priorities, data ecosystems, dissemination, and long-term program growth.
Consolidated an independent research agenda while expanding leadership across international research programs and interdisciplinary teams.
Research leadership connecting AI, urban systems, design, and implementation.
Today, I combine an independent research agenda with the leadership of interdisciplinary teams and international research programs, connecting computational urban research with design, planning, and real-world implementation.
Alongside program leadership, I maintain an active research practice spanning AI and cities, computer vision, public space, environmental exposure, mobility, and urban health, with work published in Nature Computational Science, Nature Water, Scientific Reports, and Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.
I also work beyond conventional academic outputs, translating research into tools, datasets, digital platforms, visualizations, exhibitions, installations, and public-facing experiences that connect scientific knowledge with planners, decision-makers, communities, and broader audiences.
For me, research does not end with understanding a city. It becomes meaningful when that understanding can inform how cities are planned, designed, and changed.
I build research programs with cities, not only about them, working with municipalities, universities, industry, and community organizations to turn shared urban challenges into evidence they can act on. Dubai, Rio de Janeiro, and Seoul each taught me a different way in, and how to keep very different partners working on the same question.
Designing urban life for extreme climate.
A research program combining AI, computer vision, sensing, and urban experimentation to address thermal comfort, greenery, mobility, environmental exposure, and urban food systems.
~60 km street-level imagery · 20+ researchers & collaborators · 6+ local & strategic partners
Explore Dubai Lab ↗Informal settlements, researched with the people who live there.
A research program on Rio’s informal settlements, built with residents of Vidigal and Maré and with Redes da Maré. Community workshops shaped the research around the problems residents face every day: air quality, humidity and heat, and mobility.
Vidigal & Maré · community workshops · LiDAR + AI 3D mapping · community-deployed sensors · mobility data · 6 months of monitoring
Explore Rio Lab ↗Understanding the social life of public space through AI.
A research program on loneliness and social mixing amid profound demographic change, using new AI tools to study how urban design shapes encounters in public space and to show future planners which spatial elements help people interact.
Loneliness · social mixing · public space · visual AI · behavioral analysis · evidence for planners
Explore Seoul Lab ↗Urban intelligence at the soft edges of the city.
A research program connecting urban sensing, AI and field experimentation to biodiversity, climate, energy, circularity and mobility with city, academic and industry partners.
30+ researchers & collaborators · 30+ talks, workshops & public engagements · 8+ research & strategic partnerships
Explore Amsterdam Lab ↗Evidence for mobility decisions in extreme climate.
A strategic research collaboration using visual AI and mobility data to understand heat exposure, walkability, and short car trips, and translate that evidence into transportation and planning decisions.
* Numbers reflect each program's own stage and shape, not a shared template.
Across these cities, the same research practice has emerged: start with a real urban problem, build what is needed to observe it, and translate that evidence into tools for planning and design.
Projects on how people experience cities, how cities shape health and everyday life, and how evidence can turn into design and planning decisions.
Using the COVID-19 campus closure as a natural experiment, Proximate followed 18 months of email among 2,834 MIT faculty and postdocs, from in-person work to remote work in March 2020. More than 4,800 weak ties were lost, about 1.8 per person, and 38.7% fewer new weak ties formed; reintroducing co-location led to partial regeneration. The model separated co-location effects by office distance, research unit and past communication.
Physical space is social infrastructure.
From observing human behavior → to making it measurable.
If spatial conditions shape how people connect, how can these relationships become observable at the scale of cities?

Cover design by Martina Mazzarello, Aug 2022.
Data Slots investigates the trade-off between the perceived benefits of data-driven urban services and concerns around privacy. Technology alone cannot determine what a smart city should measure: citizens must be part of that decision.
The game pairs a type of data with an urban scenario, so people can weigh the trade-off themselves: online in 80+ countries, in person in 23 cities. What they accept to share, and for which benefits, becomes material for data governance.
Data-driven planning requires social legitimacy, not only technical capability.
From collecting data → to questioning who defines it.
Making cities observable also raises a question of agency: who decides what should be measured, shared, and considered valuable urban evidence?
In Jackson, Mississippi, we linked the city’s boil-water alerts with daily school attendance to trace how an infrastructure failure travels beyond the pipes. Alert days were associated with a 1–10% rise in unexcused absences. For planning, infrastructure reliability becomes a spatial justice question: which neighborhoods, and which schools, absorb the cost when systems fail.
Infrastructure failure is an environmental justice issue: when water systems break down, the costs reach classrooms.
From urban systems → to human consequences.
Measuring infrastructure revealed that urban conditions cannot be understood only through performance: their consequences are unevenly experienced across people and places.

Cover design by Martina Mazzarello, Apr 2023.
The spaces where people spend most of their lives are an overlooked dimension of urban form and inequality. Using computer vision across 400,000+ interior images from 80 cities, we made indoor environments observable at scale: layouts, objects, their relations and the activities they host, revealing systematic geographic and cultural differences in how homes are organized and inhabited.
AI can reveal dimensions of urban life that conventional planning data cannot see.
AI as an urban observational instrument.
Visual AI showed how previously inaccessible dimensions of urban life can become observable at scale, extending what planners can measure beyond conventional datasets.
Cooling Path combines urban morphology, visual AI on street imagery and pathfinding to route pedestrians through shade from buildings, trees and connected indoor passages in Dubai. Compared with the shortest route, the cooling path adds only 1.3% distance. The model reveals not only how pedestrians can adapt, but where cities should add shade, crossings, trees, and connected indoor passages.
Computation can turn environmental conditions into actionable urban decisions.
From measuring conditions → to changing individual choices.
Once environmental conditions can be mapped, computation can help people navigate them, turning urban data into actionable decisions.
Re-Leaf uses street-level imagery and spatially aware visual AI to map urban tree diversity without labeled inventories, across eight North American cities and more than 1.7 million trees. It helps cities find monoculture risks and spatial inequalities, and move from planting trees to planning resilient urban forests.
The work also became installations in Venice, Dubai and Rome.
Urban forestry is not only about planting more trees. Diversity can be measured, mapped, and incorporated into planning.
From individual adaptation → to urban intervention.
But adaptation cannot only help people navigate existing conditions. The next question is how cities can change the environments themselves.
Food platforms reveal how neighborhood structure and digital availability shape everyday health choices. Menus from Boston, London and Dubai map the nutritional quality of each neighborhood; 2.78 million Dubai orders show that people rarely pick the closest equivalent option.
The food environment doesn't just reflect a city. It shapes the choices available within it.
From urban environments → to the choices they shape.
The project expanded the question from what cities provide to how availability, accessibility, and urban context influence everyday behavior, and ultimately health.
Shish taouk, tracked: a nutritional snapshot of one dish across the platform.
Conventional monitoring cannot capture street-by-street conditions inside Rio’s favelas. In Maré, one of the city’s largest favela complexes, the evidence was built with the people who live there, together with Redes da Maré.
Residents assembled the sensors, chose where to install them, collected and interpreted the evidence, and used it to set priorities: temperature, humidity and particulate matter measured at the scale where people actually experience them.
The people most exposed can also be the ones who produce the evidence.
From using urban data → to co-producing it.
When conventional datasets leave places invisible, producing evidence becomes part of the research itself, and raises questions of participation, ownership, and environmental justice.

Installing an Octopus sensor on a rooftop in Maré.
In Vidigal, Rocinha, Complexo do Alemão, Maré and Rio das Pedras, Brisa+ builds 3D models from airborne LiDAR, simulates winter-solstice sun and street ventilation, and classifies every built cell against both floors. It identifies where settlement geometry limits these protective conditions, and therefore where in-situ upgrading can act without demolishing or relocating communities.
In-situ options: selective alley widening, height adjustment, openings and courtyards.
Environmental health is spatial, and urban form can reveal where intervention matters most.
From measuring conditions → to identifying where cities can act.
Once environmental disadvantage becomes visible, urban form can help distinguish where those conditions are structurally constrained, and therefore potentially actionable through planning.
Wearable sensors followed people along their real trajectories, pairing measured PM₂.₅ with mobility and ventilation data to estimate what each person actually inhales. In Milan, walking meant 3.1× the exposure of driving and 4.7× the inhaled dose. The project can inform route design, modal policy, and the placement of low-exposure infrastructure.
Environmental exposure is experienced at the scale of people, not averages.
From citywide conditions → to individual experience.
Wearables connect urban environments, mobility, and physiology, shifting the unit of analysis from city averages to the person actually moving through them.
Citizens contribute the walks; visual AI turns them into scalable, geolocated sidewalk evidence; conformal prediction measures how uncertain each assessment is. AI prioritizes where inspection is needed. It does not replace it.
AI should not replace inspection. It should reveal where inspection matters most.
From scaling observation → to building trustworthy AI.
Scaling urban observation is not enough. AI-supported planning tools must also reveal uncertainty and distinguish what can be assessed automatically from what still requires human judgment.
Common Reason develops AI systems that reason across urban evidence, analytical tools and design alternatives for complex urban decisions. My role is the urban design layer: turning planning questions into spatial constraints, generating and comparing design alternatives, and keeping the reasoning legible to planners and residents.
Resiliency and AI: where heat suppresses walking, and how shade, trees and routes restore comfort within real budgets.
Living and AI: resident-generated evidence on public space, accessibility and greenery, turned into design decisions.

Three routes compared around a road closure, with travel times and traffic.

The chosen route, followed at street level.
AI becomes useful to cities when it reasons like a design process: from evidence, to alternatives, to shared decisions.
From urban evidence → to design alternatives people can discuss.
My research spans urban design and environmental planning. Images, sensors, and spatial models reveal patterns, but changing a place takes design judgment, local knowledge, and institutions able to act. I develop human-centered urban AI that connects evidence with spatial reasoning, design alternatives, and collective action.
The future I am interested in is not one in which AI designs cities for people, but one in which AI expands people’s capacity to design cities together.
Explore the research behind this agenda →






Selected ongoing research, including preprints and manuscripts under review or submission.
MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning · Politecnico di Milano
I teach urban design and environmental planning as spatial inquiry and collective transformation. Drawing, mapping, field observation, and critique are the foundation; data and AI expand the questions students can ask, without replacing design judgment or engagement with people.
I want to educate designers who use new forms of intelligence without surrendering their own judgment.
Turning research into exhibitions and public talks, where the work opens up to communities and broader publics.
← Swipe to explore →
Urban Visual Intelligence
Examines how artificial intelligence is transforming the way cities are read and understood, from surveillance footage to satellite imagery, through case studies spanning the United States, Stockholm, Amsterdam, Beijing, Dubai, and Singapore, alongside the ethics of visual surveillance and algorithmic bias.
View at Routledge →